Why India should join hands with China to succeed?

 Like it or not, India needs China like nothing more than now. India is at brink of defeat if not come inline with China. The defeat not in terms of battle field field whether it is related to border tensions. One has to expect China has successfully able to overcome pandemic , its GDP is all time high and he is just very close to be a next superpower. I don't think Trump or Biden for that matter makes any difference what China has made so far.

It is a time now, world has to expect China as a big superpower. If India want get over to its world trade and meet its domestic demands and investment they have to look upon China for it. Banning their products and China made App is not alternative. India has to start building its manufacturing capacity at ground level. Their Make In India model is just another brick in the wall. They haven't been able to make any impact or convert it in reality. Modi regime just fall short of good think tank and just marching towards monopoly of two big giants such as Adani and Ambani. They are big elephants and will pose a great deal of challenge to small and medium size business.

With weak apposition, it is sure road to Modi led government to have clear mandate in 2024 lok sabha election. If that happens that means India will be pushed to a very orthodox growth and reforms which is harmful as its toxic Nationalism will lead India to poverty and feudal war within its mass. This will play against India-China relationship plus India-Pakistan. With extreme tension and unrest relationship with neightbours will drift India's reform to a level of utmost impact taking it back to emergency and slowly making India's stand in world stage a weak power. India's brain drain will happen rapidly with no prospect and job apportunity. 

India has tough challenge and rough terrains and round about with these key issues at hand

1. Pollution

2. Imbalance of resources 

3. Poverty line

4. Jobs 

5. Domestic consumption

6. GDP

7. World trade Export vs Import

8. Property/Infrastructure

9. Nationalism will divide with greater chances of constitutional and judiciary reform will bend the legal system and free speech in democracy

10. Foreign investment

11. Caste system will make polorised and divided mindset.

12. Buying parliamentary powers will bring end to democracy

13. Petty issues like Love Jihad, CAA, NRC etc will break the backbone of secular India and make it hardcore Hindu power. Like other Arab countries.

14. Fuel and energy sector will hit the economy. Subsidy will be taken away as RBI will fall short of reserve. 

Modi need to pull this off smartly if he has to stay in the game for long time like Putin and Xing Pi

Why BJP cares for Bengal than Bihar 2020?

Since very beginning of ruling of NDA or BJP led government , with advent of Modi, it is evident Adnai and Ambani will take every inch of Inida business house. It is a start of new monopoly strategy breaking the backbone of medium and small industries at its beak. Now coming back to Bihar . Bihar has nothing to offer to BJP. There is no industries, no natural resouce , no generation of incomes. Like the way world eye on Arab countries for Oil. Similarly BJP eye Bengal for all its power to retain a long term of 2024 lok sabha election. 

If BJP wins Bengal they will surely win 2024 lok sabha election. Under strict motto of hindutva and upper caste safe guard law in UP. UP is still the strongfold of BJP.

Making no mistake Amit Shah knows very well. He is smart investor as a politician.He is home minister less but more like a smart manager who knows where to put his resources to work most.

Given that BJP is well aware they are going to loose Bihar. It doesn't bother them much. It is politics of profit and loss. If they even win Bihar they have to shed lot of money to overcome employment. They don't want to do that.

What problem world scientist has to solve?

 Problem we have in hand?

• SOLAR
• WIND 
• PLASTIC
• BUSH FIRE
• BATTERY
• LANDFIELD- DUMPING GROUND WASTE

SOLAR

Smaller size solar panel to generate more energy or equivalent energy as per size given today

WIND ENERGY

localizing wind turbine plant to individual home/business

PLASTIC

Alternative to plastic. These days everything is plastic

BUSH FIRE

Contain or prevent Bush fire

BATTERY

Small size battery to power your house and car. Compact small yet powerful

LANDFIELD

Technology to reduce landfield waste , electronic waste and so on.

Android Device Terms you should be familiar of

ROM is simply a modified version of an Android operating system all of our Android devices come with a default ROM by the manufacturer, but we can modify this.

AOSP. Android Open Source Project. Now this is just simply the operating system, the Android operating system completely stripped down, and it's given to developers and manufacturers so they can go through and customize it to create their own ROM. 

Firmware. Now firmware is kind of like a driver. It's just a piece of software that makes the hardware function correctly with the OS. 

Open source is a piece of software that's free to edit and to be used or distributed and shared at no charge. 

Bloatware.  This is software or applications that are installed on your mobile devices that you don't necessarily need, that the manufacturer and/or the OEM has agreements with these pieces of software. They're actually making a little bit of a money on the backside for every activation, you know, for example, Dropbox. Dropbox pays to get their app installed automatically on your Android device. Now because these are pre-installed, 

APK.  Android application package. This is the file extension for applications in the Android environment. So for example, fortnite would have a fortnite.apk would be the name of the file. 

Multiple startup project in Visual studio 2019

 

Commutative, Associative and Distributive Laws

Wow! What a mouthful of words! But the ideas are simple.

Commutative Laws

The "Commutative Laws" say we can swap numbers over and still get the same answer ...

... when we add:

a + b  =  b + a

Example:

... or when we multiply:

a × b  =  b × a

Example:

Commutative Percentages!

Because a × b  =  b × a it is also true that a% of b  =  b% of a

Example: 8% of 50 = 50% of 8, which is 4

Why "commutative" ... ?

Because the numbers can travel back and forth like a commuter.

Associative Laws

The "Associative Laws" say that it doesn't matter how we group the numbers (i.e. which we calculate first) ...

... when we add:

(a + b) + c  =  a + (b + c)

... or when we multiply:

(a × b) × c  =  a × (b × c)

Examples:

This:	(2 + 4) + 5  =  6 + 5  =  11
Has the same answer as this:	2 + (4 + 5)  =  2 + 9  =  11

This:	(3 × 4) × 5  =  12 × 5  =  60
Has the same answer as this:	3 × (4 × 5)  =  3 × 20  =  60

Uses:

Sometimes it is easier to add or multiply in a different order:

What is 19 + 36 + 4?

19 + 36 + 4  =  19 + (36 + 4) 
=  19 + 40 = 59

Or to rearrange a little:

What is 2 × 16 × 5?

2 × 16 × 5  =  (2 × 5) × 16 
=  10 × 16 = 160

Distributive Law

The "Distributive Law" is the BEST one of all, but needs careful attention.

This is what it lets us do:

3 lots of (2+4) is the same as 3 lots of 2 plus 3 lots of 4

So, the 3× can be "distributed" across the 2+4, into 3×2 and 3×4

And we write it like this:

a × (b + c)  =  a × b  +  a × c

Try the calculations yourself:

• 3 × (2 + 4)  =  3 × 6  =  18
• 3×2 + 3×4  =  6 + 12  =  18

Either way gets the same answer.

In English we can say:

We get the same answer when we:

• multiply a number by a group of numbers added together, or
• do each multiply separately then add them

Uses:

Sometimes it is easier to break up a difficult multiplication:

Example: What is 6 × 204 ?

6 × 204  =  6×200 + 6×4
=  1,200 + 24
=  1,224

Or to combine:

Example: What is 16 × 6 + 16 × 4?

16 × 6 + 16 × 4  =  16 × (6+4)
= 16 × 10
=  160

We can use it in subtraction too:

Example: 26×3 - 24×3

26×3 - 24×3 = (26 - 24) × 3
=  2 × 3
=  6

We could use it for a long list of additions, too:

Example: 6×7 + 2×7 + 3×7 + 5×7 + 4×7

6×7 + 2×7 + 3×7 + 5×7 + 4×7
= (6+2+3+5+4) × 7
= 20 × 7
= 140

And those are the Laws . . .

                  . . . but don't go too far!

The Commutative Law does not work for subtraction or division:

Example:

• 12 / 3 = 4, but
• 3 / 12 = ¼

 The Associative Law does not work for subtraction or division:

Example:

• (9 – 4) – 3 = 5 – 3 = 2, but
• 9 – (4 – 3) = 9 – 1 = 8

 The Distributive Law does not work for division:

Example:

• 24 / (4 + 8) = 24 / 12 = 2, but
• 24 / 4 + 24 / 8 = 6 + 3 = 9

Summary

Commutative Laws:	a + b  =  b + a a × b  =  b × a
Associative Laws:	(a + b) + c  =  a + (b + c) (a × b) × c  =  a × (b × c)
Distributive Law:	a × (b + c)  =  a × b  +  a × c

China , US, Australia , Japan and India rising tension and a protracted cold war

Bulletin TheAustralian reported...

Escalating hostilities between China and the US are reaching a point of no return. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has delivered his most damning indictment of the Chinese Communist Party to date. Rumination about war developing between the two nations has been superseded by concern over whether the US is prepared to defend itself as well as allied states should relations deteriorate.

The Australian government is no longer sitting on the fence. It has taken the moral high ground by siding with the leader of the free world. However, without sufficient military preparation or a geopolitical strategy that establishes new alliances and trade diversification, our capacity to survive a protracted cold war with China is limited.

Under Xi Jinping, China has become a menace to the international community.

By JENNIFER ORIEL

TheGuardian

Australia to step up South China Sea defence cooperation with US – but won't commit to patrols

Allies release joint statement of ‘deep concern’ over China’s actions in Hong Kong and repression of Uighurs and vow to fight disinformation

Australia has pledged to increase defence cooperation with the US in the South China Sea – but stopped short of making any specific new commitment on freedom of navigation operations, despite American pressure.

The two allies have also decided during high-level talks in Washington to set up a working group to push back at false information across the Indo-Pacific region, warning that “state-sponsored malicious disinformation and interference in democratic processes are significant and evolving threats”.

While the joint statement expressed “deep concern” over a range of actions taken by China – including a “campaign of repression of Uyghurs” and undermining of freedoms in Hong Kong – Australia’s foreign affairs minister, Marise Payne, said her country had “no intention of injuring” its important relationship with Beijing.

Payne and the defence minister, Linda Reynolds, agreed in face-to-face talks with their US counterparts, Mike Pompeo and Mark Esper, to pursue “increased and regularised maritime cooperation” in the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean, “bilaterally and in concert with other likeminded and regional partners”.

The joint statement declares that Beijing’s maritime claims in the South China Sea “are not valid under international law”, but Australia appears to have held firm against conducting freedom of navigation exercises within 12 nautical miles of disputed features.

Experts say the US has long been pushing for Australia to conduct such exercises, but Australia has resisted taking such a step to date – in part to avoid inflaming tensions with China, its largest trading partner.

Payne said Australia and the US had a close and enduring relationship but made their own decisions based on their values.